After an entire semester of studying sustainability and environmental aspects of product development, production, and disposal, I have finally gained enough knowledge to compose a case study on the complete life cycle of cowboy boots. It includes details of a LCA and why it is important to understand what exactly goes into and comes out of a product.
The following link is for my Life Cycle Analysis Paper on cowboy boots:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByXNDe4nLYSnY2RRQ05VM2FsWG8&authuser=0
Environmental Sustainability (ENV 250) - Spring 2015
Thursday, May 7, 2015
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Life Cycle Analysis Project – Life Cycle Assessment
In continuing my research on cowboy boots for the Life Cycle Analysis project, attached is a life cycle assessment flowchart for a pair of cowboy boots. It includes the raw materials/energy and emissions associated with material production, materials/energy and emissions associated with product manufacture, product uses and maintenance, and finally product disposal.
The following link is for my Life Cycle Assessment on cowboy boots:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByXNDe4nLYSnZEl6Szl4TmZDMmc&authuser=1
The following link is for my Life Cycle Assessment on cowboy boots:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByXNDe4nLYSnZEl6Szl4TmZDMmc&authuser=1
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Life Cycle Analysis Project – Fact Sheet
For the Life Cycle Analysis project, I chose an item that almost every American owns a pair of, whether they are used for their intended purposes or for fashion purposes: cowboy boots. Originally custom-made items, these popular western items have become timeless. They were used as early as the Civil War and are still used by many today, both in the saddle and on the runway.
The following link is for my Fact Sheet on cowboy boots:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByXNDe4nLYSndkpIODdmdEpTZms/view?usp=sharing
The following link is for my Fact Sheet on cowboy boots:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByXNDe4nLYSndkpIODdmdEpTZms/view?usp=sharing
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Traffic Survey – 4641 Presidential Pkwy, Macon, GA 31206
Although it has been pretty chilly
lately, I observed the passing traffic on a beautiful Wednesday afternoon while
sitting outside McAllister's Deli and enjoying some lunch. What I came to
observe did not necessarily shock me, but I was somewhat surprised at the
results of my one-hour survey.
Before I sat down to begin surveying
the passing cars, I had some ideas in mind about what I might observe. Since
the cars were driving through a rather large commercial shopping area,
I expected:
- most of the vehicles to pass by would be cars of
various sizes (and not trucks);
- most of the vehicles to be older or more dated models,
due to the surrounding area's population demographics (ex: low household
income);
- a wide range of new and old cars
- mostly small or medium-sized vehicles, due to the
surrounding area's population demographics (ex: low household income);
- and the vehicles to have anywhere between one to four
passengers, due to the surrounding area's population demographics (ex:
higher frequency of households with two or more people).
Because I was conducting the survey
myself, it was difficult to observe and assess every single passing car on that
busy afternoon. I was only able to record about 1/5 of the total passing
traffic from 2:30pm-3:30pm. Despite inevitable human error that comes from
conducting a survey, I feel that my results are pretty representative of
the population in that area as a whole. My observations can be seen in the
following chart:
Car/Truck
|
Vehicle
Model
|
Vehicle
Age (New/Old)
|
Vehicle
Size
(S, M,
L)
|
#
Occupants
|
T
|
Ford
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Toyota
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Nissan
|
N
|
L
|
2
|
T
|
GMC
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Jeep
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
T
|
Toyota
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Chevy
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Dodge
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Saturn
|
N
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Toyota
|
N
|
S
|
2
|
C
|
Chevy
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
T
|
Dodge
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Toyota
|
O
|
S
|
2
|
C
|
Mercedes
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Nissan
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Nissan
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Jeep
|
N
|
M
|
2
|
T
|
Toyota
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Lexus
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Chevy
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Ford
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
T
|
Ford
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
T
|
Chevy
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Nissan
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Buick
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Mercedes
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Chevy
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
N
|
S
|
2
|
C
|
Chrysler
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
T
|
GMC
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Ford
|
O
|
L
|
2
|
T
|
Chevy
|
N
|
L
|
2
|
C
|
VW
|
N
|
S
|
2
|
C
|
Toyota
|
O
|
M
|
2
|
C
|
Ford
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Ford
|
N
|
M
|
2
|
C
|
Pontiac
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
GMC
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Toyota
|
N
|
M
|
1
|
T
|
Chevy
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Mercedes
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Dodge
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
T
|
Chevy
|
N
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
N
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
BMW
|
N
|
S
|
2
|
C
|
Chevy
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Dodge
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Lexus
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Toyota
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
M
|
1
|
C
|
Honda
|
O
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Dodge
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
T
|
Dodge
|
O
|
L
|
1
|
C
|
Chevy
|
O
|
M
|
2
|
C
|
VW
|
N
|
S
|
1
|
C
|
Acura
|
O
|
M
|
2
|
As you can see, some of my results
were in line with my predictions and others were more surprising. As predicted,
the majority of vehicles passing by were cars and not trucks. In regards to
vehicle models, about half of the vehicles were Japanese-made and only about a
quarter of them were American-made. This was not surprising either because
Japanese cars tend to have a higher market share in America today than American
cars. I was slightly surprised at the nearly-even split between "old"
and "new" vehicles. While many of the old cars were very old
(pre-2000s), many of the new cars were also very new (post-2012). Car size was
spread pretty evenly between "small", "medium", and
"large" vehicles. Multiple times, I saw both older and newer versions
of the same vehicle model pass by, and in many of the instances when the
models were medium- or large-sized vehicles, the newer versions were
larger than the older versions. This trend might be due to the fact that
Americans are known for driving larger vehicles than the rest of the world, and
car manufacturers might be trying to satisfy American consumers' wants and
needs when it comes to vehicles by making them "bigger and better"
than their previous versions. The last asset of the study was the number of
occupants per vehicle. This is where I was most surprised. Less than 25% of the
vehicles I observed had more than one person in the car. Whether the single
passengers were running errands, getting lunch during their work break, or
driving to meet somebody, their cars were emitting the same emissions than they
would have been if they were carpooling with other people. It might not be as
convenient to carpool with people to and from work, school, or the grocery
store, but it has the potential to seriously reduce carbon emissions, which is
important in today's world of rising world temperatures and drastically
changing climates.
One thing that I did
not account for in the survey but was surprised to see
nonetheless was the rarity of hybrid or electric cars. Back home in Atlanta,
electric cars, such as the Nissan Leaf, have become very popular. Whether
electric car owners bought the car to be more environmentally-friendly or to
make a statement about their "conservative efforts", hybrid and
electric cars are the future. As we continue to deplete the fossil fuel
reserves around the world, people are turning to alternative methods of energy
and transportation.
In conclusion, this traffic study
gave me some useful insight about vehicle characteristics and use in the Macon
area. It was not a difficult study to carry out, and the results reminded me
that our assumptions are not always accurate.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)